ETEGOS, John

Bef 1371 - Yes, date unknown   Has no ancestors and no descendants in this family tree.

[--?--], Ellen

Bef 1371 - Yes, date unknown

Birth	Bef 1371
Died	Yes, date unknown
Family	ETEGOS, John,   b. Bef 1371

• Name	ETEGOS, John
  Birth	Bef 1371
  Gender	Male
  Death	Yes, date unknown
  Person ID	I1728	Edgoose
  Last Modified	30 Jan 2026

  
  

  Family	[--?--], Ellen,   b. Bef 1371   d. Yes, date unknown
  Family ID	F943	Group Sheet  |  Family Chart
  Last Modified	27 Jan 2026

  
  

• Notes

  JOHN ETEGOS or ETKUS Bef 1368-Aft 1372 21 August 1368 Macclesfield "fin' .ij.s' Ric'us Waspe p tans f'ca conta stat' vrsus Ric'm Hubard de Stokport put co'uict' est ad dampa sua duor solid'. D fine ppl' Will'i del Dale de Stokport, Joh' Edkus & Joh' le Barbor &c' " Translated from the original Latin: fine 2s Richard WASPE for trespass made against the statute against Richard HUBARD of Stokport, as he is convicted, to the damage to him of two shillings. By fine by pledge of William del DALE of Stokport, John EDKUS and John le BARBOR &c. (Macclesfield Hundred, PRO SC2/253/3) 24 June 1370 Macclesfield "m'ia iij'd Will's de Cestr' p eo q'd iniuste prsent' affr' pacis intr Ric'm le Ward & Joh'em Edkus in m'ia &c' Et affer' ad iij.d' m'ia .iij.d' villata de Bromale qa no' ven' +p vnu' ho'iem+ ad inquir' in affr' prd'ca cu' villats de Stokport & alijs adnexis I'o ip'a in m'ia &c' Et affer' ad iijd'. &c' " Translation from the original Latin: 3d amercement William de CESTR' because he unjustly presented an affray of the peace between Richard le WARD and John EDKUS, in mercy &c. And affeered at 3d 3d amercement The township of Bromale because it did not come (by one man) to inquire into the affray aforesaid with the townships of Stokport and the others adjacent. Therefore it is in mercy &c. And affeered at 3d &c. (Macclesfield Hundred, PRO SC2/253/4) 4 August 1371 Macclesfield "m'ia xijd' Joh'es Edkus de Stokport qui tulit billam vrsus Rad'm del HOLT de pl'ito tans non est ps' &c' I'o ip'e & W..... ..... [pleg'] de ps' in m'ia Et prd'cus Rad'us eat inde sine die &c' " Translation from the original Latin 12d amercement John EDKUS of Stokport, who brought a bill against Ralph del HOLT in a plea of trespass, has not prosecuted &c. Therefore he and W..... ..... his pledge of prosecution in mercy. And the aforesaid Ralph may go thence sine die &c. (Macclesfield First Hundred after Eyre, PRO SC2/253/5) 29 September 1371 Macclesfield "12d amercement John CHAPPEMON for breach of the peace made upon Ellen wife of John ETKUS at Stokport, in mercy &c." (Macclesfield Hundred, PRO SC2/253/6) 26 July 1372 Macclesfield "m'ia xijd' Joh'es ETEGOS de Stokport p fl'o clam' suo v'sus Rob'tum de TATTON'. sen' & Margar' vx' eius de pl'ito tans in m'ia &c' " Translation from the original Latin: "12d amercement John ETEGOS of Stokport for his false claim against Robert de TATTON senior and Margaret his wife, in plea of trespass, in mercy &c." (Macclesfield First Hundred in Eyre, PRO SC2/253/6) 2 August 1372 Macclesfield "12d amercement Robert de TATTON of Kenworthey because he has not prosecuted &c. John ETKUS of Stokport in a plea of trespass, in mercy &c. by pledge of Robert de LYNAY, &c." (Macclesfield Second Hundred in Eyre, PRO SC2/253/6) 6 September 1372 Macclesfield "6d amercement Margaret wife of Robert de TATTON for breach of the peace in Stokport upon John ETKUS of Stokport, in mercy &c. And assessed at 6d." (Macclesfield Hundred, PRO SC2/253/6) (revised 05.02.2014)