EDGOOSE:
 In search of Ancestry


PETTET, Catherine Elizabeth

PETTET, Catherine Elizabeth

Female 1845 - Yes, date unknown   Has no ancestors and no descendants in this family tree.


Personal Information    |    Notes    |    All    |    PDF

  • Name PETTET, Catherine Elizabeth 
    Birth Between 1844 and 1845  Hanover Square, London Find all individuals with events at this location 
    Gender Female 
    Death Yes, date unknown 
    Person ID I6509  Edgoose
    Last Modified 3 Feb 2026 

    Family ENSOR, Francis Sidney,   b. 1841, France Find all individuals with events at this locationd. 25 Feb 1893, Sheerness, Kent, England Find all individuals with events at this location (Age 52 years) 
    Marriage 1872  Kensington Registration District, London Find all individuals with events at this location 
    Family ID F2488  Group Sheet  |  Family Chart
    Last Modified 27 Jan 2026 

  • Notes 

    • CATHERINE ELIZABETH PETTET

      A Catherine Elizabeth, daughter of Charles and Louisa PETTET, clerk, of 4 Charles Street, was baptised at St. Mary, Bryanstone Square, Westminster, Middlesex, on 28 January 1844.

      Catherine Elizabeth PETTET may be the daughter of Charles and Louisa PETTET living at 13 Oxford Villas, Hammersmith, in the 1871 census:
      *Catherine E. PETTET, daughter, aged 27, unmarried, teacher of music, born at St. Ann, Soho.
      (RG10/62/70/27)

      The marriage between Francis Sidney ENSOR and Catherine Elizabeth PETTET was registered in 1872.
      (GRO September Q 1872 Kensington 1a 161)

      The 1881 census of 27 Letterstone Road, Fulham, London:
      F. S. ENSOR, head, aged 39, married, civil engineer, born in France, British Subject;
      *Kate ENSOR, wife, aged 36, married, born at St. Geo. Hanover Square, London;
      Gertrude FISHER, niece, aged 17, unmarried, born at Marylebone, Middlesex;
      Theresa POWERS, servant, aged 15, domestic servant, born at Battersea, Surrey.
      (RG11/68/73/8)

      Catherine Elizabeth ENSOR appears to have remarried as soon as her husband died, perhaps because he left her just £2. The name of her second husband is not yet known.
      (GRO March Q 1893 Lambeth 1d 481)

      NOTES & QUERIES
      1891 Census: Untraced

      (revised 19.10.2011)